Œcumenical Panheresy.

I am Mr. G. Z. Thompson. You may call me Mr. Thompson.

24.8.05

There was another tract on the coffee table.

I thought since the first one had listed a copyright date of 1974 that they were old, remnants of a bygone era or a misspent youth, but the second tract had a web site listed. Oh my! So perhaps I should take back my assumptions about the tract not being representative of my parents' views. But the place isn't all bad, apparently they give out free copies of their "Bible Walk" in Russian to those going to Russia to evangelize the pagan Russians and rescue them from the clutches of popery [sic] and monkery. And, all seriousness aside, their "Christian Walk Battle-Map" has a few good things about it: it seems to acknowledge paedo-baptism and it acknowledges the goal of theosis. It sort of reminds me of the icons of the Ladder, though without the monks falling off into perdition - and that's the one major failing.

2 Comments:

At 24/8/05 21:47, Blogger Alice Teresa said...

Is that man on the "broad road" whistling? Ha ha ha!

It certainly does demonstrate a "once-saved-always-saved" theology. But it isn't quite clear enough for papists like me... it seems to be based on "dedication and walk with Christ", rather than faith alone... so what's the difference between that dedication and the broad path they assign to "good works"?

 
At 24/8/05 22:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Whistling, of course, is demonic.

The difference: Polemics? Ordo salutis? They certainly don't have enough of a mystical theology to make any substantial claims. I mean, Luther said that the difference between him and the Scholastics is that, in their mystical theology, where they say love, he says faith. That is a real difference that makes a difference - but it's far more subtle than "sola fide" - which, if you leave it at mere sloganeering, isn't such a difference.

Well, there is a real difference: once you make the salvation decision, you cannot be damned, and Hell and Heaven are two distinct actual places. Your reward in heaven may differ, but no matter what, you are in heaven. And what I said about paedo-baptism being supported is not true, the birth mentioned is undoubtedly the experience of radical conversion rather than the waters of baptism. Once your life has really and truly been dedicated, one cannot fail to attain heaven. One is irrevocably in the "Heaven" box, though one might not be much like Christ when one gets there. One is in no way in the "Hell" box.

Which is, of course, obvious nonsense even from the sola scriptura viewpoint.

mr thompson

 

Post a Comment

<< Home